York v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California. Rollie A. York and another were convicted of an offense, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
[1] The plaintiffs in error will be named herein defendants, as they were in the court below. They were convicted under an indictment charging them with a conspiracy to pass counterfeit $5 gold pieces. They assign error to certain remarks of the trial court made under the following circumstances:
Moffitt, a witness for the government, testified that he had a conversation with the brother of the defendant York, in which he stated that he believed that the defendant York knew more about these counterfeit coins than he said he knew, and he asked York’s brother to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Crumpton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Chadwick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- McKnight V. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Joseph Daniel Holt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Langford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. Raymond J. Berkley and Anthony VerziCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1936
- Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.