Legal Opinion

Langford v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 28, 1949No. 12156_1PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

Langford, the appellant, was convicted of violation of the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 398 [now § 2421]. The indictment was in two counts. Count One charged the transportation of a woman, one Carol Jones, in foreign commerce, from Los Angeles County, California, to Tiajuana, Mexico, for purposes of prostitution, debauchery and other immoral practices. The second count charged transportation of the same woman, for the same -purposes, from *50Tiajuana to Los Angeles County. Conviction was on Count Two only.

The evidence showed that at the time of the transportation mentioned in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Adamson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. James Leak, Relator-Appellant v. Harold W. Follette, Warden, Green Haven Prison, Stormville, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. George P. Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. DoctorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  4. George Leslie Samuels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. Karl L. Smith v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API