Legal Opinion
Walker v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 12, 1939No. 4423PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
The appellants, Harry S. Walker, Peter McKay and Herbert Hatfield, together with Cecil Vandell and Ira Webb, were indicted for conspiring to commit divers offenses against the United States, and for doing certain acts in pursuance of the conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 88. It was charged that they conspired: (1) to violate 26 U.S.C.A. § 1184 by carrying on the business of a distiller without giving bond and with intent to defraud the United States of the tax on distilled spirits; *467(2) to violate 26 U.S.C.A. § 1150 by carrying on the business of a retail liquor…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Di Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. WoelfleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Curtis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Metzler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Simon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Epstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. Paul N. Hankish, and James L. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Richard Lane v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Edwin Wallace PennixCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.