Legal Opinion
McKnight V. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 6, 1902No. 1,078PublishedCited by 80 opinions
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky.
1Opinion of the Court
DAY, Circuit Judge.
This case having been before this court upon former writs of error, it is unnecessary to state in detail the facts upon which it depends. McKnight v. U. S., 38 C. C. A. 115, 97 Fed. 208; Id., 49 C. C. A. 594, 111 Fed. 735. We shall proceed to notice some of the assignments of error:
1. Upon the question of the burden of proof to establish the intent of the accused to' defraud the bank in doing the acts charged, the court, in response to a request of the defendant, gave the charge as follows:
“On motion of the defendant the court instructs the jury that intent is a fact to be…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Claassen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Himmelfarb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Redfield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- State v. GibbonsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. TalleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- United States v. Robert G. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.