Legal Opinion

Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co. v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 28, 1936No. 2PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involved an action of assumpsit by James R. Nelson and Joseph Ernest Richards, the plaintiffs below, for the recovery of a commission alleged to be. due them from the Canadian Industrial Alcohol Company, Ltd., the defendant below, for procuring, at the request of that corporation, a purchaser for a large quantity of whiskey belonging to it and stored in Canada.

Nelson and Richards in the court below declared on the common counts, including work and labor done, at the request of the defendant company; and the amended bill of particulars attached thereto was as follows:

“Canadian…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Fox v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Roche v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Eggleston v. BoardmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co. v. Klaxon Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Prashker v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  4. Jeddeloh v. HockenhullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Canister Co. v. National Can Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API