Legal Opinion
Praxair, Inc. v. Atmi, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 29, 2008No. 2007-1483, 2007-1509PublishedCited by 142 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Praxair, Inc. and Praxair Technology, Inc. (collectively “Praxair”) brought suit alleging that defendants ATMI, Inc. and Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. (collectively “ATMI”) had infringed three patents: U.S. Patent No. 6,007,609 (the “'609 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 6,045,115 (the “'115 patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 5,937,895 (the “'895 patent”). The district court entered a final judgment concluding that claims 1, 2, 6, 7, and 8 of the '609 patent and claims 18 and 20 of the '115…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by142 opinions
- Bancorp Services, L.L.C. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. Of Canada (u.s.)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Katz v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.