Legal Opinion

McNeiley v. Ayres Jewelry Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1994No. 94-97PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellants Cheri McNeiley and Donald Smith (the consignors) appeal from the district court’s order which granted a judgment in favor of Appellees Ayres Jewelry Co. (the consignee) and Charles Ayres.

We affirm.

Issues

The consignors present three issues for our review:

Were Appellants afforded due process as guaranteed by the United States and Wyoming Constitution[s]?

Was the Judgment supported by sufficient evidence in accordance with W.R.C.P. Rule 52(a)?

Are Appellants entitled to a change of judge under the circumstances of this case?

Facts

The consignors sued the consignee and Mr.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Richardson Associates v. Lincoln-Devore, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Boyce v. WestCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. White v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ekberg v. SharpWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Candelaria v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Adkins v. LawsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cotton v. BrowWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Resource Technology Corp. v. Fisher Scientific Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API