Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Lawson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1995No. 94-176PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Eleanor Adkins appeals from an order which granted a partial summary judgment in favor of Appellee Gayle Lawson, the executrix of the estate of Walter Washut (the estate). Adkins was seeking compensation for the work and services she had performed over a period of several years for Washut.

We affirm.

Issues

Adkins presents four issues:

I. Does the requirement of the Dead Man Statute for corroboration of evidence come into play in the Summary Judgment stage in a proceeding?

II. Do the facts presented regarding the services performed by the appellant at the request of and on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hawk Ex Rel. Jensen v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Equality Bank of Evansville v. SuomiWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sandstrom v. SandstromWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bowles v. Sunrise Home Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. McNeiley v. Ayres Jewelry Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Metz Beverage Co. v. Wyoming Beverages, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Scherer Construction, LLC v. Hedquist Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. EM Nominee Partnership Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Eklund v. PRI Environmental, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Duncan v. Town of JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API