Legal Opinion

Resource Technology Corp. v. Fisher Scientific Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1996No. 96-38PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellants Resource Technology Corporation, Robert RucinsM, and Joseph Morotti appeal from the judgment which was entered in favor of Appellee Fisher Scientific Company-

We affirm.

ISSUES

The appellants present the following issues on appeal:

1. Where FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY induced Mr. Morotti and Mr. RucinsM to take part in a joint, four-year business project, then FISHER abandoned the project after one year, and after ordering production of less than half the quantity of goods originally intended: Did the trial court err in holding that the doctrine of promissory estoppel did…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Thatcher's Drug Store of West Goshen, Inc. v. Consolidated Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. McRoberts v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Peleg v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Bear Peak Resources, LLC v. Peak Powder River Resources, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Goglio v. Star Valley Ranch Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Nuhome Investments, LLC v. WellerWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Shaw v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API