Legal Opinion

Glasgow v. Fox

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 5, 1988No. 62849PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

The substantive issue in this case is whether appellant’s petition stated facts which, if taken as true, stated the elements of a cause of action for malicious prosecution. A procedural issue, raised by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, involves a question of the timeliness of the appeal based on when a final appealable order occurred.

Because the Court of Appeals incorrectly treated the procedural question, and because this case presents a case of first impression in Oklahoma, we Grant Certio-rari, Vacate the Court of Appeals Opinion, and Affirm the trial court.

Appellant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Young v. First State Bank, WatongaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Stevens Expert Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Mabry v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Merchants Delivery Service v. Joe Esco Tire Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  5. Savage v. SeedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Greenberg v. WolfbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Stork v. StorkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Portland Trailer & Equipment, Inc. v. A-1 Freeman Moving & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. City of Lawton v. International Union of Police Associations, Local 24Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API