Grodhaus v. State

Phipps, Judge.

Adam Grodhaus appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol to the extent he was less safe to drive (DUI). He claims that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the results of field sobriety evaluations and that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. Finding no merit in either claim, we affirm.

When an appellate court reviews a trial court’s order concerning a motion to suppress evidence, the trial court’s decision with regard to questions of fact and credibility must be accepted unless clearly erroneous. The reviewing court…