Legal Opinion
State v. Turnquest
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 6, 2019No. S19A0157PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
305 Ga. 758
FINAL COPY S19A0157. THE STATE v. TURNQUEST. PETERSON, Justice. This is another DUI case requiring us to consider the meaning of the Georgia Constitution. In Miranda v. Arizona,
384 U. S. 436
( 86 SCt 1602, 16 LE2d 694) (1966), the United States Supreme Court imposed on law enforcement a requirement to provide persons in custody with a prophylactic warning of their rights before subjecting those persons to interrogation. Today we hold that neither the Georgia right against compelled self-incrimination, the Georgia right to due process, nor a Georgia statute prohibiting compelled…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ammons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
- ROCKDALE COUNTY. v. U. S. ENTERPRISES, INC.; And Vice VersaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- Garrison v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
- Awad v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.