Bramlett v. State

MlKELL, Judge.

Following a jury trial, Mitchell Curtis Bramlett was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol to the extent it was less safe for him to drive and speeding. Bramlett appeals, asserting in his sole enumeration of error that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence of his performance of two field sobriety tests, the walk and turn and the one-leg stand. He argues that his performance of these two tests was not consensual. Finding no error, we affirm.

On appellate review of a trial court’s order concerning a motion to suppress evidence, three…