Legal Opinion

State v. Turnquest

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 6, 2019No. S19A0157PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This is another DUI case requiring us to consider the meaning of the Georgia Constitution. In Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), the United States Supreme Court imposed on law enforcement a requirement to provide persons in custody with a prophylactic warning of their rights before subjecting those *868persons to interrogation. Today we hold that neither the Georgia right against compelled self-incrimination, the Georgia right to due process, nor a Georgia statute prohibiting compelled self-incrimination requires law enforcement to provide…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ammons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  2. ROCKDALE COUNTY. v. U. S. ENTERPRISES, INC.; And Vice VersaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  3. Garrison v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
  4. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
  5. Williams v. YounginerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API