Bell v. State

RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Michael Bell was convicted of driving under the influence to the degree it was less safe for him to drive (“DUI less safe”), driving with a suspended or revoked license, and failing to maintain his lane. He appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. Bell also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, the defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence, and we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict. We neither…