Legal Opinion
Beauty Craft Supply & Equipment Co. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 14, 1992No. C3-91-733PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellant Beauty Craft commenced this action against respondents State Farm and Michael Nelson, a State Farm agent, alleging Nelson breached a duty to recommend employee dishonesty coverage when he sold a State Farm insurance policy to Beauty Craft in 1985. The trial court ruled that Nelson had no duty to advise Beauty Craft of the availability of employee dishonesty coverage. We affirm.
FACTS
Beauty Craft (BC) is a wholesaler selling to beauty salons. Max Wexler (Wexler), who is a lawyer, has been involved in BC since 1968. In 1981 his mother, Sidora Wexler, began to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Gabrielson v. WarnemundeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Johnson v. UrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Louwagie v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Osendorf v. American Family Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- Southwest Auto Painting & Body Repair, Inc. v. BinsfeldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Gates v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Klimstra v. State Farm Auto Ins. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Transport Leasing/Contract, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Ma Amba Minn., Inc. v. Cafourek & Assocs., Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.