Legal Opinion

Southwest Auto Painting & Body Repair, Inc. v. Binsfeld

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 2, 1995No. 1 CA-CV 93-0305PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Judge.

This appeal is from summary judgment entered in favor of defendants. In granting summary judgment, the trial court held that, as a matter of law, an insurance agent does not owe a client or customer any duty to recommend or advise of the need for any specific insurance coverage. We hold that an agent owes a duty to a client or customer to exercise reasonable care, skill, and diligence in procuring insurance and that questions of the applicable standard of care and whether the agent breached his duty by failing to recommend specific coverage present questions for the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Coburn v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Nelson v. DavidsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hardt v. BrinkDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mladineo v. SchmidtMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Link v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. Sintros v. HamonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. Webb v. GittlenArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Gamez v. Brush Wellman, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API