Stotsenburg v. Fordice
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Floyd Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.
In November, 1866, one Maginnis executed to the appellant’s predecessor three promissory notes, each for $1,627.27, “with interest at the rate of six per cent., payable semi-annually and specifically in gold coin.” To secure said notes he executed his mortgage on certain real estate. In November, 1871, Maginnis conveyed the real estate to the appellee Fordice, and one Devol, who assumed the payment of said mortgage. In November, 1877, what was supposed to be one-half of said debt was paid. In May, 1892, by order of the Floyd Circuit Court, in partition, said real estate, as the property of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Stix v. SadlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Worley v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- City of Indianapolis v. McAvoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Curran v. CurranIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Ingalls v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Whitlock v. Public Service Co. of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
- In re Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Monroe Financial Corp. v. DiSilvestroIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Johnson v. SherwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Lesh v. DavisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.