Legal Opinion

Lesh v. Davison

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1914No. 22,536PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Wells Circuit Court; Charles E. Sturgis, Judge. Action by Charles F. Davison against Otto Cupp and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

This is, in fact, an action for an accounting for money, brought by appellee against one Cupp as principal defendant, and appellant Lesh as garnishee defendant. Cupp assigned error after the appeal was perfected. The assignment of errors by Lesh is in overruling his motion for a venire de novo, and error in specified conclusions of law on the facts found, and Cupp assigns error in sustaining a demurrer to his fifth paragraph of answer, and as to specified conclusions of law, and in overruling his motion for a venire de novo. The evidence is not in the record. The issues are presented by a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville Water Supply Co. v. RiterIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Kennedy v. RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Boil v. SimmsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Curran v. CurranIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Emery v. RoyalIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lakeshore Bank & Trust Co. v. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Koors v. Great Southwest Fire Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Bryan v. ReiffIndiana Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API