In re Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Original Action.
1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.
The petitioner, the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company, seeks the issuance of the alternative writ of mandate by this court directing the Appellate Court of Indiana, or its judges to certify, or to show cause why the case of said company against John M. Hays and another, appealed to said court, should not be certified to this court for consideration and decision.
The petition discloses that the Appellate Court assumed jurisdiction of said appeal, rendered its opin*696ion and decision therein and, upon further opinion, overruled the petition of said company for a rehearing.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Union School Township v. National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Blough v. ParryIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Newport v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Benson v. ChristianIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Prunk v. Indianapolis Redevelopment CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Manley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
- Newman v. GatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Ross v. Terre Haute, Indianapolis & Eastern Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1930
- Hobbs v. Gibson School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.