Legal Opinion

Ingalls v. Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1889No. 13,953PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

— Miller instituted a suit against Ingalls and another to recover a sum of money alleged to have been obtained from him by means of a conspiracy.

It is charged in the complaint that the defendants, one of whom was an attorney, falsely represented to the plaintiff, a mentally weak, illiterate, and infirm old man, that Ingalls had a meritorious cause of action against him, and that, unless the plaintiff settled and paid a sum of money demanded, suit would be instituted at once for a large amount, and that a judgment would be recovered against him, and that he would be subjected to costs, trouble…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bethell v. BethellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. McKee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Town of Ligonier v. AckermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Worley v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. City of Indianapolis v. VajenIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Culley v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. New v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Mendenhall v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Baldwin v. HutchisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Stauffer v. HulwickIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API