Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Hines

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1893No. 16,235PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

This is an action by the appellants, against the appellees, to quiet the title to certain real estate. Appellees answered by general denial, and also filed a cross-complaint claiming title in themselves.

There was a trial resulting in a finding for the appellees on the issues joined on the complaint, and against them on their cross-complaint. .

The real estate in controversy is a part of lot 5 in G. H. Voss’ addition to the town of Noblesville, in Hamilton county, Indiana. Appellants and appellees both claim title through one S. C. Montgomery, who owned the lot, with others, after the same was…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mall, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State of California v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  3. Loveladies Property Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. BARNEGAT CITY, ETC., CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Earl v. DutourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Wegge v. MadlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API