Legal Opinion

Kelemen v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1982No. Civ. 21686PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

We issued an alternative writ of prohibition to consider whether the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction in setting a separate trial to determine whether the statute of limitations contained in Code of Civil Procedure section 340.5 or that in Civil Code section 29 controls a minor’s cause of action fof injuries allegedly caused by medical malpractice before or during birth. While we shall find that the trial court did not act improperly, we shall conclude that Code of Civil Procedure section 340.5 states the applicable period of limitations in a medical malpractice…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Scott v. McPheetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Olivas v. WeinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Palmer v. AgeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bledstein v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Prince v. Sutter Health CentralCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Hollingsworth v. KofoedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Knox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Ankrom v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API