Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ankrom v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 11, 2013No. 1110176 and 1110219Published

1ConcurrenceParker, Justice

In Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973), the United States Supreme Court created a fundamental right for pregnant women, allowing them to terminate their pregnancies through medical abortions under certain circumstances, in spite of the fact that those abortions resulted in the death of their unborn children. Subsequently, Roe has sometimes been misread as holding that those unborn children are not persons and do not have the same fundamental rights as does every other person, which rights must be protected by the law. As I explained in Hamilton v. Scott, 97 So.3d…

2Cases cited104 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Renslow v. Mennonite HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Cowe Ex Rel. Cowe v. Forum Group, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API