Legal Opinion

Whitmore v. Welch

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1949No. 7063PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, justice.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the district court whereby the application of defendant, C. J. Welch, to appropriate water for power purposes, which plaintiffs protested, was approved with a conditional modification of the point of return to avoid a present conflict with protes-tante prior filing. On a trial de novo, the district court rendered substantially the same decision as that made by the state engineer.

The facts pertaining to this controversy may be summarized as follows: In 1920, Utah Granite and Marble Company made a filing on Little Cottonwood Canyon creek…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Little Cottonwood Water Co. v. KimballUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Eardley v. TerryUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Rocky Ford Irr. Co. v. Kents Lake Reservoir Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Duchesne County v. HumpherysUtah Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Riordan v. WestwoodUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Lehi Irr. Co. v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Western Water, LLC v. OldsUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. American Fork Irr. Co. v. LinkeUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Little Cottonwood Water Co. v. Sandy CityUtah Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API