Whitmore v. Welch
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McDonough, justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the district court whereby the application of defendant, C. J. Welch, to appropriate water for power purposes, which plaintiffs protested, was approved with a conditional modification of the point of return to avoid a present conflict with protes-tante prior filing. On a trial de novo, the district court rendered substantially the same decision as that made by the state engineer.
The facts pertaining to this controversy may be summarized as follows: In 1920, Utah Granite and Marble Company made a filing on Little Cottonwood Canyon creek…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Little Cottonwood Water Co. v. KimballUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- Eardley v. TerryUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Rocky Ford Irr. Co. v. Kents Lake Reservoir Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
- Duchesne County v. HumpherysUtah Supreme Court · 1944
3Cited by7 opinions
- Riordan v. WestwoodUtah Supreme Court · 1949
- Lehi Irr. Co. v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1949
- Western Water, LLC v. OldsUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- American Fork Irr. Co. v. LinkeUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Little Cottonwood Water Co. v. Sandy CityUtah Supreme Court · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.