Legal Opinion

Van Tuyl v. Robin

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Demubeeb to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitakeb, J.

This is an action brought by the superintendent of banks to ascertain the existing assets and liabilities of the Northern Bank of New York, to determine the deficiency of assets, if any, and to compel the stockholders to contribute to such deficiency according to the number of shares of stock held by each. The plaintiff is presumed to have joined all the stockholders of record as defendants. The defendant Ferdinand Hall and others demur to the sufficiency of the complaint, first, upon the ground of insufficiency of facts alleged; second, that plaintiff has not the legal capacity to sue;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McMahon v. . MacYNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Cheney v. ScharmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Wiener v. BoehmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Wheeler v. WernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Broderick v. AdamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Broderick v. AaronNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Holmberg v. AnchellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
  4. Brusselback v. Cago CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
  5. Van Tuyl v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API