Legal Opinion

Cheney v. Scharmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, August 0. Scharmann, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 23d day of January, 1911, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial before the court without a jury, at the Kings County Trial Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodwaed, J.:

The Lafayette Trust Company was a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of article 5 (former article 4) of the Banking Law of the State of New York, engaged in the conduct of the business of a trust company.

On the 30th day of November, 1908, the plaintiff, as Supérin-tendent of Banks, took possession of the property and business of said company, in accordance with the authority conferred upon him by section 18 of the Banking Law (Gren. Laws, chap. 37 [Laws of 1892, chap. 689], as amd. by Laws of 1908, chap. 143), which is now section 19 of the Banking Law…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marshall v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Hornor v. HenningSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Davis v. . Supreme Lodge, Knights of HonorNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Terry v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. National Bank v. . DillinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Broderick v. RosnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Collier v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Broderick v. AdamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Richards v. RobinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Van Tuyl v. RobinNew York Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API