Legal Opinion

Brusselback v. Cago Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 11, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

My decision is:

1. That this suit be dismissed as against defendant Spiegelberg without costs for the reason that he was made a party hereto solely for the purpose of discovery, and has complied with the prayer of the complaint in that respect, leaving no residuum of relief due from him to the plaintiffs.

2. That the suit be dismissed as against Sirma Devlet without costs.

3. That the complainants have, with costs, a decree, as hereinafter indicated in the following memorandum opinion, as against all the other defendants herein who have been served with process and still…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Mammoth Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Wheeler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Ward v. JoslinSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. EW Bliss Company v. Cold Metal Process CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
  2. In Re CarmonaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1963
  3. United States v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of LexingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1967
  4. Long v. DickDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
  5. United States v. TotDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API