Hellman v. Karp
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Bastardy complaint, brought before the City Court of Hartford (Bullard, J.) which found probable cause and bound over the defendant for trial in the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County; that court, Markham, J., found the facts and rendered judgment against the defendant, from which he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
The first four assignments of error are based upon errors committed by the trial court in respect to certain findings. The defendant has sought to correct these findings under the procedure authorized by § 5832 of the General Statutes, by which the evidence and rulings, duly certified, are made a part of the record; and if, upon examination of these, the court on appeal shall decide that the finding does not properly present the facts and rulings, it shall correct the same.
In order to secure the correction of a finding by this procedure and to give the appellate court a basis of action, it is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. SebastianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Hourigan v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Booth v. HartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- Robbins v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
- Atwater v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Palomba v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. TorelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- State v. LenihanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Miller v. KirshnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Brown v. CatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.