Legal Opinion
American Federation of Government Employees v. Weinberger
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided December 2, 1986No. CV486-353PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDENFIELD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action seeking injunctive relief and a declaratory judgment with respect to the validity of Directive 1010.9 of the Department of Defense (DoD Directive) and Army Regulation 600-85, Interim Change No. 111. In essence, the plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of periodic drug testing of civilian employees occupying “critical”positions with the Department of Army. Before the Court is the defendants’ motion to dismiss.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Nature and Scope of the Fort Stewart Civilian Drug Testing
In April, 1985, the Department of Defense…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- National Treasury Employees Union v. RaabCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
- National Federation of Federal Employees v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- National Federation of Federal Employees v. CheneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. BurnleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.