State v. Van Ruler
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from appellant’s concurrent sentences for four counts of intra-familial sexual abuse in the first degree. Appellant claims (1) the trial court abused its discretion by utilizing the Hernandez method of sentencing, and (2) the trial court acted improperly by refusing to depart dispositionally from the presumptive sentence and grant appellant a stayed sentence. We affirm.
FACTS
A Pipestone County sheriff’s office investigation revealed appellant had been sexually abusing his daughter from when she was six years old until she was I2V2 to 13 years old.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. PegelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. WebberCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State of Minnesota v. Albert Joe Ryans, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.