Legal Opinion

State v. Pegel

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 8, 2011No. A10-583PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

In this appeal from a 144-month presumptive sentence for first-degree criminal sexual conduct, appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion when it denied his motion for a dispositional departure without making a ruling on the record addressing all of the Trog factors. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Jasper Allen Pegel was charged by complaint with four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(g) (2008) (sexual penetration with another when actor has significant relationship to complainant and complainant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. SpainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. State v. WallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. CurtissCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Albert Joe Ryans, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. State of Minnesota v. Anthony Ra HareCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  3. State of Minnesota v. Boon Wa ThaoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  4. State of Minnesota v. Charles Arthur BellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  5. State of Minnesota v. Colleen Purificacion LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API