State v. Pegel
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this appeal from a 144-month presumptive sentence for first-degree criminal sexual conduct, appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion when it denied his motion for a dispositional departure without making a ruling on the record addressing all of the Trog factors. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Jasper Allen Pegel was charged by complaint with four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(g) (2008) (sexual penetration with another when actor has significant relationship to complainant and complainant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. SpainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. WallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. CurtissCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Albert Joe Ryans, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Anthony Ra HareCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Boon Wa ThaoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Charles Arthur BellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Colleen Purificacion LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.