Legal Opinion
State v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 17, 2013No. A12-1248PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODENBERG, Judge.
On appeal from his conviction of five counts of possessing a pornographic work involving minors, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 617.247, subd. 4(a) (2008), following a trial on stipulated evidence conducted pursuant to Minn. R.Crim. P. 26.01, subd. 4, appellant argues that (1) the evidence discovered as a result of the forensic analysis of his computer hard drive should have been suppressed and (2) the district court failed to exercise its discretion by not considering a downward dispositional departure. We affirm.
FACTS
In May 2009, a special agent of the Minnesota Bureau…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Illinois v. AndreasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Matthew Vaughn DiamondCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. Y. BaoMontana Supreme Court · 2024
- People of Michigan v. Kristopher Allen HughesMichigan Supreme Court · 2020
- State of Minnesota v. Bjorn Bolton IversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Bryant Jerome StephensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.