Legal Opinion

State v. Webber

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 11, 1986No. C4-85-1607PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

Thomas Webber appeals from a conviction of fourth degree assault and from an order denying a motion to modify his sentence. He contends the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did not act in self-defense and that the trial court abused its discretion by ordering a stay of execution of sentence rather than a stay of imposition. We affirm.

ISSUES

1. Was there sufficient evidence for the jury to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant was not acting in self-defense?

2. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Van RulerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. TheisenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HAWKEYE BAIL BONDSSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  2. Candyce L. Brown v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API