Legal Opinion

Nasharr v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 22, 2012No. 11-885TPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MILLER, Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The issue for decision is whether plaintiffs Anthony J. and Maria T. Nasharr1 have met the required jurisdictional elements to proceed before the Court of Federal Claims on their request for an abatement of the penalty assessed for their failure to pay income taxes for the 2003 tax year. Argument is deemed unnecessary.

FACTS

Athough this case specifically concerns the circumstances surrounding the 2003 tax year, the developed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Diamond v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Martti v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Turpin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Raleigh W. Hall & Margaret E. Hall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Carr v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API