Legal Opinion

Raleigh W. Hall & Margaret E. Hall v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 31, 2013No. 13-3TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tax Refund; Net Operating Losses; 26 U.S.C. § 172; Mitigation Provisions of 26 U.S.C. §§ 1311-1315; Circumstance of Adjustment, 26 U.S.C. § 1312

OPINION & ORDER

Futey, Judge.

This case is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, filed March 20, 2013. Plaintiffs responded on May 15, 2013 with a cross-motion for summary judgment, and defendant responded on June 6, 2013. Plaintiffs filed their reply on July 8, 2013. Defendant’s motion seeks dismissal of plaintiffs’ complaint on statute of limitations grounds, and plaintiffs seek summary judgment in…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martti v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Albemarle Corporation & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API