Legal Opinion

Carr v. Internal Revenue Service

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 22, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00744Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PHYLLIS CARR, Case No. 20-cv-00744-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING CASE 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 48, 65, 75, 79, 81 12 13 Pro se plaintiff Phyllis Carr filed suit against defendant United States, arguing that she is 14 entitled to a refund for taxes that she allegedly overpaid in 2012. Both parties have filed motions 15 seeking summary judgment in their favor. On this record, I find that I…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API