Fagundes v. Ammons Dev. Grp., Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
DIETZ, Judge.
*736 The central issue in this appeal is whether employees injured while working in "ultrahazardous" jobs may sue their employers in the court system despite the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act requiring those claims to be pursued at the Industrial Commission.
Plaintiff Francisco "Frank" Fagundes, who seeks to sue his employer for injuries suffered during a blasting accident, acknowledges that this is a novel argument. But he contends that his position is simply a logical extension of our Supreme Court's decision in Woodson v. Rowland , 329 N.C. 330 , 407 S.E.2d 222 (1991).
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Camalier v. JeffriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- Kinsey v. SpannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Pendergrass v. Card Care, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Howe v. Links Club Condo. Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Estate of Belk by and Through Belk v. Boise Cascade Wood Prods., L. L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- Haarhuis v. CheekCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- In Re Matter of on GeorgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- Fagundes v. Ammons Dev. Grp., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.