Legal Opinion

In Re Matter of on George

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 2019No. COA18-611PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZACHARY, Judge.

*39KPC Holdings and National Indemnity Group ("National Indemnity" and collectively "Respondents") appeal orders adding them as parties to this action, setting aside an order for foreclosure, canceling a deed, and denying an indicative joint motion for relief under Rule 60(b)(6). After careful review, we conclude that the trial court correctly determined that the foreclosure sale in this case was invalid due to lack of proper service of the notice of foreclosure, and that the trustee on a deed of trust other than that on which foreclosure was instituted was not a necessary party…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Das v. State of NCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
  2. In re Foreclosure of GeorgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
  3. In re GeorgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
  4. Mixon v. ApenbrinckDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API