Legal Opinion
Eureka Teacher's Assn. v. Board of Education
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 1988No. A039170PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
In this case we hold that (1) a substitute teacher’s illusory classification as a day-to-day substitute despite her actual service as a long-term substitute did not deprive her of reemployment rights conferred on long-term substitutes, and (2) her request for backpay and fringe benefits was incidental to her mandamus action for reemployment and thus was not subject to the Tort Claims Act.
The Board of Education of the Eureka City Schools (the Board) appeals from a judgment in favor of The Eureka Teacher’s Association (the Teacher’s Association) and Dian Moehnke granting a writ…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Loehr v. Ventura County Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Snipes v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Taylor v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Dilts v. Cantua Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Harris v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Board of Administration v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Michael E. Hubbard v. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael E. Hubbard v. Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Lozada v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Balasubramanian v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- California School Employees Ass'n v. Governing Board of South Orange County Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.