Legal Opinion

Bushnell International, Inc. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 7, 1973No. 5484, C.A.D. 1104PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baldwin, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Courst, Second Division, Appellate Term1 affirming the judgment of a single judge sitting in reappraisement.2 The goods are optical goods including binoculars, which were manufactured by Toyo Jitsúgyo KK, exported from Japan by Oriental Trading Co., Ltd., and imported into the United States during the period August 14, 1964, through October 14,1964. The judgments of the Customs Court upheld the appraised values returned by Customs officials.

It is agreed that the proper basis of appraisal is export value as defined…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The United States v. Pan American Import Corp., M. H. Garvey Co., the United States v. Hub Floral Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Bushnell International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. Bushnell International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lmi--La Metalli Industriale, S.P.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Jay-Arr Slimwear Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  3. LMI-La Metalli Industriale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API