Legal Opinion

The United States v. Pan American Import Corp., M. H. Garvey Co., the United States v. Hub Floral Manufacturing Company

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 23, 1970No. Customs Appeal 5338, 5352PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This opinion explains our decisions in two appeals which were briefed separately and argued separately but by the same counsel on the same day.

The first appeal (No. 5338, United States v. Pan American Import Corp., et al.) is from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, Third Division, Appellate Term, 61 Cust. Ct. 619, 292 F.Supp. 718, A.R.D. 248 (1968), reversing the decision and judgment of a single judge sitting in reappraisement, 58 Cust.Ct. 608, R.D. 11269 (1967).

The second appeal (No. 5352, United States v. Hub Floral Manufacturing Co.) is from the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pan American Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. H. M. Young Associates, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  2. Globemaster Midwest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. B & W Wholesale Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  4. United States v. Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1971
  5. Bushnell International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API