Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Winthrop

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2006No. 101316PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitzgerald

Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Freeman, McMorrow, Kilbride, Garman, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

The Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) filed a two-count complaint against respondent, Peter Deforest Winthrop, charging him with various violations of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct (Rules). The Hearing Board recommended that the charges against respondent be dismissed. The Review Board reversed, found that respondent committed several violations of the Rules, and recommended that respondent be suspended from…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Horwitz v. Holabird & RootIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re HopperIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In Re GerardIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People ex rel. Attorney General v. BeattieIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. DeLuna v. BurciagaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In Re CutrightIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In re KaravidasIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In re MulroeIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In re J.S. II, L.L.C.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API