Niedermeyer, Inc. v. Fehl

The plaintiff Niedermeyer, Inc., was in the possession of a fund, which, according to the opinions of the supreme court, it was its duty to return to the parties entitled thereto. To* this fund numerous conflicting claims were being asserted, and it was impossible for plaintiff to determine with’ safety, to whom this money should be paid. The plaintiff was clearly-entitled to. institute this interpleader suit: 33 C. J. 424 to 446; 15 R. C. L. 222, et seq.; Pope v. Ames, 20 Or. 199 (25 P. 393); North Pac. Lbr. Co. v. Lang, 28 Or. 246 (42 P. 799, 52 Am. St. Rep. 780); McFadden v. Swinerton, 36…