Legal Opinion

Riedel v. First Nat. Bank of Or.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1979No. TC A7611-16311, SC 25613PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

The parties are agreed that this appeal involves actions on cross claims made by First National Bank (FNB) against U. S. National Bank (USNB) and Portland General Electric Company (PGE), and by USNB against PGE in the nature of indemnity for the recovery of attorney fees allegedly authorized by ORS 74.2070(3). Both banks incurred attorney fees in defending a cause brought against them by plaintiffs herein. The plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Riedel, brought an action against PGE, USNB and FNB charging all three defendants with recklessness and seeking general and punitive damages.

The parties are…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Gilbert v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers, Local Union No. 701Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Gresham State Bank v. O & K Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. WaterhouseOregon Supreme Court · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. McAdam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Booras v. UyedaOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Lewis v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Cook v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API