Legal Opinion

Scott v. Kirtley

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 6, 1933PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.

In this case complainant below, Fred EL Kirtley, alleged that as a duly licensed and quáliñed practitioner of law in the State of Florida, he was retained by defendant below, Mary Evans Scott, for the purpose of representing her.in a professional capacity in securing for her a child’s part in an estate in which Mrs. Scott was interested; that when she retained Mr. Kirtley, Mrs. Scott was completely out of funds and unable to pay her attorney a retainer or other fee at the time she engaged him, and that it was accordingly arranged between the parties that the attorney so employed would be paid…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fillmore v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. State ex. rel. Wolfe v. KirkeSupreme Court of Florida · 1868

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Sinclair, Etc. & Zavertnik, PA v. BaucomSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Daniel Mones, PA v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Colligan v. CousarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  4. Litman v. FINE, JACOBSON, SCHWARTZDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Chapman v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1961

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API