North Pacific Lumber Co. v. Lang
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Multnomah: Hartwell Hurley, Judge. About March first, eighteen hundred and ninety-three, one Matti Makarainin, at plaintiff’s instance, sold and delivered to it certain saw logs of the reasonable value of some three hundred and thirty-one dollars, from which the sum of two dollars and seventy cents was to be deducted as scaling charges, leaving a balance due from plaintiff of about three hundred and twenty-eight dollars, which Makarainin assigned two days…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Multnomah: Hartwell Hurley, Judge. About March first, eighteen hundred and ninety-three, one Matti Makarainin, at plaintiff’s instance, sold and delivered to it certain saw logs of the reasonable value of some three hundred and thirty-one dollars, from which the sum of two dollars and seventy cents was to be deducted as scaling charges, leaving a balance due from plaintiff of about three hundred and twenty-eight dollars, which Makarainin assigned two days thereafter to Eli Maketa, and he to defendant Lang and Company on the seventh of the same month. After the sale Makarainin gave…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Wolverton.
1. It is not attempted by the foregoing statement to set forth or take note of all papers filed or all orders of the court, but the endeavor has been to state sufficient of the record to enable this opinion to be understood. The record is encumbered with many papers which were perhaps unnecessary, and might have been omitted if the ordinary practice attending a bill of interpleader had been pursued. The complaint or *252bill of interpleader filed by plaintiff seems on its face to state sufficient for the purposes of the suit. Such a bill will lie where twro of more…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Leonard v. . Columbia Steam Navigation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Herrick v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Burns v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Aldrich v. Anchor Coal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Herron v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Maxwell v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Riedel v. First Nat. Bank of Or.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Phillips v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Parker v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.