Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hyde

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1934PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

A. E. Peirce & Company, the predecessor in interest of plaintiff, Jackson and Michigan Securities Corporation, during the year 1930, obtained a permit as a broker of securities in Oregon, and plaintiff, New Amsterdam Casualty Company, executed with said broker its bond in the sum of $5,000 to secure said permit. Ida J. Hyde and Alice F. Hyde brought an action in the circuit court of Multnomah county (hereafter referred to as case No. 105-446), based on fraud, on said bond against said broker and its surety. The defendants therein denied all liability, and contested said action on its merits,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteakerOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Leggett v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  3. Wright v. WimberlyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Salo v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. First Nat. Bank of Montgomery v. Montgomery Cotton Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Hunter v. CunningOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. HudsonOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Paulsell v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Union Land Associates v. UssherOregon Supreme Court · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API