Legal Opinion
Saecker v. Cohn
California Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 1919No. L. A. No. 4747PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant.
The complaint alleges a cause of action to quiet the title of plaintiff to a certain quarter-section of land described, situated in Kern County. The answer denied the plaintiff’s ownership and alleged that the defendant is the owner of the premises under a tax deed from the state of California, that the plaintiff claims title adverse to the defendant, and asks that the defendant’s title be quieted as against the claim of plaintiff. It also avers that the action is barred by section 318 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Webber v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Coryell v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Williams v. City of San Pedro Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- De Frieze v. QuintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Henderson v. De TurkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richert v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Playa De Flor Land & Improvement Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, Canal Zone · 1945
- Attebury v. WaylandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Berry v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Sevenman v. Long Bell Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954