Legal Opinion

State v. Birk

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 5, 2004No. A03-1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

Appellant challenges her conviction of third-degree driving while impaired (DWI) (having an alcohol concentration of .10 or more within two hours of driving), arguing that (1) the evidence was insufficient to prove that the Intoxilyzer test was reliable and (2) she faced an unconstitutional presumption of guilt at trial based on the Intoxilyzer test result. We affirm.

FACTS

At approximately 1:00 a.m. on May 13, 2003, Lino Lakes Police Officer Adam Hal-verson stopped appellant Wendy Birk for an improper lane change. Halverson noticed a strong odor of alcohol while speaking…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. State v. AltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ArdsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  2. In Re Transfer to Disability Inactive Status of VerbrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API